Legal Case - Criminal

2/2/2022 Myself and a former councillor were arrested without warrant, highly irregular for suspision of harrassment they used code G of PACE 1984 this is usually a voluntary interview by request. 

REASON ? section 1(1a) and section 4 Harrassment

Pretty amazing as niether suspect had phoned, texted, messaged, whatsapped, emailed or made any form of contact, bravo cheshire police, or was there some other reason ?............

(1)A person must not pursue a course of conduct—

(a)which amounts to harassment of another, and

(b)which he knows or ought to know amounts to harassment of the other.

[F1(1A)A person must not pursue a course of conduct —

(a)which involves harassment of two or more persons, and

(b)which he knows or ought to know involves harassment of those persons, and

(c)by which he intends to persuade any person (whether or not one of those mentioned above)—

(i)not to do something that he is entitled or required to do, or

(ii)to do something that he is not under any obligation to do.]

(2)For the purposes of this section [F2or section 2A(2)(c)], the person whose course of conduct is in question ought to know that it amounts to [F3 or involves] harassment of another if a reasonable person in possession of the same information would think the course of conduct amounted to harassment of the other.

(3)Subsection (1) [F4or (1A)] does not apply to a course of conduct if the person who pursued it shows—

(a)that it was pursued for the purpose of preventing or detecting crime,

(b)that it was pursued under any enactment or rule of law or to comply with any condition or requirement imposed by any person under any enactment, or

(c)that in the particular circumstances the pursuit of the course of conduct was reasonable.

This link below was just ONE of the catalyst for the situation

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/16heZCj9NU/?mibextid=wwXIfr&__cft__[0]=AZVysvsrUojY0mwO7jUPs2TQsiNl7b5dh2CVHcHhPUrdodLRpewA0AubmqIDHFVqZ5fNf88J9rFwCXj8S7GwlycQrkQ_iVP2rj8W9vZ-3kj-OdJ23mOF4sWIqctc9-V3NovHSuSTwpykU9AtGaXxGXR2&__tn__=R]-R

And therefore my actions were just and lawfull

(1)A person whose course of conduct causes another to fear, on at least two occasions, that violence will be used against him is guilty of an offence if he knows or ought to know that his course of conduct will cause the other so to fear on each of those occasions.

(2)For the purposes of this section, the person whose course of conduct is in question ought to know that it will cause another to fear that violence will be used against him on any occasion if a reasonable person in possession of the same information would think the course of conduct would cause the other so to fear on that occasion.

And with a case totally devoid of any threats or even the slightest hint of violence the Crown Prosicution Service (CPS) ordered that there be "NO CASE TO ANSWER"

So Cheshire Constabulary has egg on their faces yet again